beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단1583

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Part 30 (No. 4), No. 30 (No. 4), No. 3, the Agricultural Cooperative Cash Card.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the tentatively named “Sphishing” organization that receives money from victims under the name of another person who has been secured in advance by deceiving many unspecified victims to make a loan to an unspecified number of victims and then receives money under the name of the victims as a loan repayment, etc., and serves as the role of delivering the money received from the victims in cash and delivering it to the persons who have withdrawn the money in cash under the above several laws.

On May 29, 2015, the Defendant accepted the proposal from the person who was unaware of his/her name to transfer the withdrawn cash to the account that he/she had secured in advance by the victims, in collusion with those who were not aware of his/her name, by accepting it on May 31, 2015. The Defendant, upon receiving the proposal, decided to commit a crime by delivering the withdrawn cash to the account under the direction of the head of G Office and remitting it to the account that he/she had secured in advance by the victims who were not aware of his/her name, and then withdrawing it in cash, upon receiving the order of the person who was not aware of his/her name (the head of G Office).

1. On June 5, 2015, an employee of the “Singing” in the above false statement of fraud stated that “a loan may be granted up to KRW 22 million per annum if he/she sends money to repay part of an existing loan to the victim H by misrepresenting himself/herself of the said public offering, and then, by telephone, to the victim H by telephone. It would be 3.2% per annum, and a loan will be granted in lieu of the existing loan if he/she deposits money to the account notified that some of the existing loans are possible to repay.”

However, the above "Sishing" staff was not agricultural personnel, and there was no intention or ability to provide a loan to the victim H.

Nevertheless, the aforementioned “Singishing” staff received KRW 12 million from the Agricultural Cooperative (J) account in the first name prepared in advance for the same day from the victim H by deceiving the victim H as above.

This is the defendant.