However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From November 3, 2009 to November 25, 2009, the Defendant conspired with C, an employee, with an “EPC room” of approximately 30 square meters on the Cheongju-gu D 2nd floor of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si. The Defendant installed 30 game equipment with an example and smoke function as an ungrade game product, and received cell phone letters from Defendant and employees C, and confirmed the face of customers who find the above game site through the four screen installed outside the game site, and made them enter the game site. The Defendant, as a business, had them display the number of 18,000 won per 20,000 won per 20,000 won on the game machine, and then, as a business of calculating and paying 18,000 won after subtracting 10% of cash from the 20,000,000 won, and had them receive a large number of 1,150,000 won of the game product using intangible game equipment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C Application of each protocol of interrogation of each police officer in relation to C, statement of the police officer in relation to F, statement of the police officer in relation to F, G, H, I, and copy of each protocol of seizure and contract prepared by J;

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. concerning criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 4 (1) 1 and Article 28 subparagraph 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.