However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on June 18, 2016, in front of the D cafeteria’s “D’s operation” restaurant, and (b) around the place of meals, the Defendant is not a party’s identity.

The State of the restaurant business, such as “A”, reported interference with the operation of the restaurant business to 112.

Accordingly, police officers, such as police officers F, etc., belonging to the king Police Station E District Group of the 22:37 on the same day, sent to the above restaurant and confirmed the circumstances of the case, and recommended the defendant to return home to the defendant, and since the test, the defendant's own "I Ye, I am Ye, I am Ye. Ne, I am to am.

Doz. Doz. Doz.

In doing so, while taking a bath such as “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling,” and “I ambling, I ambling F’s back water one time as a hand floor.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of each investigation report (10 pages of evidence records, and relative investigation of witnesses)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines / [the scope of the recommended punishment / [the scope of the recommended punishment] The Act on Interference with the Performance of Official Duties in the Case of Class 1 of the Act on Interference with the Performance of Official Duties (Obstruction of Performance of Duties and Forced Performance of Duties)], the basic area (from June to January 4) (

2. The sentencing conditions, such as the age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in full consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the sentence is to be imposed; (b) the sentence is to be imposed as ordered.

The crime of this case was committed against a police officer without any justifiable reason and the circumstances and contents of the crime are favorable to the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and there is no same criminal record as the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case.