손해배상(산)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 166,409,210 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 26, 2012 to June 24, 2015.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 08:30 on September 26, 2012, the Defendant was suffering from the injury, such as the instant project for the improvement of the forest paths (e.g., 2012) located in the Gangseo-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Donggwon (hereinafter “instant project”), which was carried out by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant project”). In the field, Nonparty B, who was the machinery saw part employed by the Defendant, was shoting the fallens that were dead by the Defendant, without any signal system as agreed in advance by the head of the said B and the Working Group C, by informing the employees who were working together of the fact of the punishment, and taking the punishment, was the wind, and the Plaintiff was unable to know the fact of the punishment, corresponding to the said fallens that the Plaintiff, who was working at the lower end, did not know of the punishment.
hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"
(B) Around June 27, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract with the Defendant on the following terms related to the instant business. - Occupational categories - Wages: Class 70,000 won per day - Work hours: 8 hours per day - Work hours per day: June 27, 2012 - the fact that there is no dispute over the completion date of the work [based on recognition], Party A’s evidence 1, 2, and 16 (including the relevant number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
written evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the facts of the recognition of liability as above, the Working Group C, an employee of the defendant, has determined a certain signal method in the logging work and inform the plaintiff and the above B thereof, let the plaintiff and the above B use the signal, and neglected the duty to educate and supervise other workers in a safe manner after checking the evacuation of the other workers.
The accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of C.
As such, the defendant is the employer of the above C, and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.
b.
Restrictions on liability, however, the above-mentioned evidence and articles 3 to 3.