“The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 196 million after deducting the amount of KRW 44 million paid by the Plaintiff from the said KRW 240 million, barring any special circumstances, as well as damages for delay.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The defendant asserts that the cancellation due to the invalidity or mistake by an inadequate indication may be cancelled, and the defendant asserts that the above payment statement is cancelled by the delivery of a duplicate of the reply in this case, because it constitutes an inadequate indication as to the plaintiff's failure to calculate the amount of the repayment that the plaintiff would collect when the plaintiff had consulted with the customer's employees, and it constitutes a false indication as to the plaintiff's failure to collect the place of payment, and the plaintiff also knew or could have known it.

On the other hand, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the preparation of the letter of payment in this case cannot be deemed as a false indication solely on the grounds alleged by the defendant, and that there was an error as to important parts in the preparation of the letter of payment, and rather, according to the evidence above, the fact that the defendant prepared part of the accrued interest after receiving the settlement details from the plaintiff as a mail, and consultation over a long time, can be acknowledged. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. The Defendant asserts that the amount borrowed from the Plaintiff was KRW 281,740,000, which was the amount borrowed from the Plaintiff, and March 17, 2015.