However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 10, 2017, at the “D” food store managed by the victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, around 18:05, the Defendant: (a) placed in the product display stand using a gap in which his employees’ surveillance was neglected; and (b) placed in the product display stand, “The amounting to KRW 5,800,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000, or0, or0, of the U.S. C’s price.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. At around 18:05 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) arrested the above store E as an employee on the ground of the above paragraph 1.1. on the same day; and (b) transferred a new disease to the police officer belonging to the F District of the U.S. Police Station in Ulsan-gu, U.S. who called the site after receiving a report on the ground of the above 1.1., the Defendant was willing to engage in the act as if he was the Defendant; (c) notified the police officer belonging to the F District in the above F District to notify him of his right to refuse to make a statement; (d) stated that he was “H” in the column for confirmation of the right to notify; and (e) submitted the signature to the above I; and (e) the Defendant continued to submit the same day to the above I, on the same day, submitted the name, resident registration number, and address of the said J in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. to the above 620 official report; and (e) stated that he was subject to the investigation.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the above H’s signature without authority and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A forged statement of confirmation, and a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to stolen objects photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act in relation to the facts constituting an offense (the intention of Section 329, the choice of imprisonment), Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of Article 239 of the Criminal Act) and Article 239(2) of the Criminal Act.