특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the part of the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act (the injury) shall be acquitted.
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a 25 ton truck truck vehicle with D Treatment 25 ton.
On September 16:20 on September 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle and proceeded with the access road of the 605-2 Bluxan IC, the error in the face-to-face Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.
At the same time, other vehicles have continued to enter the expressway Tol in the future, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front side and the left side and the right side, and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering direction and the brake system.
Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected to enter the lane by wrong entry of the vehicle and driving it into the lane, the Defendant was driving in the front side of the victim E(38) driving while driving the vehicle in the front side of the motor vehicle, and the front volume of the motor vehicle was shocked by the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as saved salt, etc. requiring medical treatment between approximately two weeks, and even if the damaged vehicle was damaged to have approximately KRW 920,958, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as removing traffic obstacles and providing relief to the victim.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the following circumstances, the part not guilty [the main sentence of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes)] revealed as evidence lawfully adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence submitted by
It is difficult to readily conclude.
In other words, beyond the doubt that the defendant was aware of the accident of this case, it was proved that the defendant was guilty without reasonable doubt.
shall not be deemed to exist.
(1) Vehicles driven by a defendant shall be.