물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 529,487,549 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from July 5, 2016 to August 16, 2016.
1. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, and the entire purport of the statements and arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the plaintiff operating a wholesale and retail business of paper products continues to provide the defendant with a printing paper and reproduction paper from November 2013 to July 5, 2016; (b) the defendant continued to pay part of the price of the goods to the plaintiff; (c) the defendant paid KRW 10 million out of the price of the goods on July 30, 2016; and (d) the remainder of the price that the defendant failed to pay out of the price of the goods was 529,487,549.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 529,487,549 won for the remainder of the goods as well as damages for delay at each rate of 6% per annum prescribed by the Commercial Act from July 5, 2016 to August 16, 2016, which is obvious in the record that the Plaintiff is the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order from July 5, 2016, and 15% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.