2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted on November 1953, while performing the special duties of the military around 1953, caused a serious injury to the left shoulder, both sides of the enemy army due to the bombomb of the enemy army. As a result, the plaintiff suffered from the legacy: (i) finite finite finite in which detailed is known; (ii) finite finite finite in which the whole voice and the spaculism are mixed; (iii) finite finite finite of both sides of the left shoulder; and (iv) finite finite finite finite of the left shoulder (hereinafter referred to as “the instant difference”).

B. 1) Medical opinions is difficult to find medical grounds to find a direct causal relationship between the present symptoms and the credit prior to 60 years. The plaintiff is in the status of both chronic chronyitis (in the form of saluty salutism) and each side (in the left saluty farming, right 81dB), and there are no medical grounds to find the direct causal relationship with the credit prior to 60 years.

B) In light of the Plaintiff’s left side, the part that begins with the extreme part-time and the extreme part-time, and the outcome of the Plaintiff’s self-contestation (MRI), the full wave of the extreme part-time, the part that was close to the shoulder, and the opinion of the side-up or the heat of the extreme part-time, are observed. However, the extreme part-time, as the extreme part-time, do not seem to have been the heat for not less than 20 years, and the turning-out of the shoulder does not seem to have been the bottle for not more than 60 years. In addition, it is common to observe within 6 months after the extreme part-time and the extreme part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part.