점유회수의 소
1. Defendant (Appointed Party) shall deliver to the Plaintiff each real estate listed in the separate sheet.
2. The Plaintiff’s Appointor B, .
1. 원고의 주장 원고는 별지 목록 기재 각 부동산을 D구역 주택재개발정비사업조합에 대한 공사대금 채권에 기한 유치권을 행사하면서 각 점유하고 있었는데, 피고(선정당사자)는 별지 목록 기재 각 부동산을 공매절차를 통해 낙찰받은 후 2014. 12. 25.경 별지 목록 기재 각 부동산 출입문에 원고가 부착하여 놓은 유치권 행사에 관한 경고문을 무단으로 뜯어내고 시정되어 있던 자물쇠를 뜯어낸 후 임의로 새로운 자물쇠를 설치함으로써 원고의 점유를 침탈하였고, 그 후 피고(선정당사자)는 별지 목록 기재 1 부동산에 관하여 선정자 B과, 별지 목록 기재 2 부동산에 관하여 ㅍ선정자 C와 각 임대차계약을 체결할 후 그 점유를 이전하였으므로, 피고(선정당사자) 및 선정자들은 원고에게 각 점유 부동산들을 인도할 의무가 있다.
2. Determination
A. (1) The determination of the claim against the defendant (appointed party) refers to the objective relationship that shows that an article belongs to a person's factual control by social norms, and in order to have de facto control, it does not necessarily mean physical and practical control over an article, but should be determined in conformity with social norms by taking into account the time, space and principal relation with the article, possibility of excluding others' control, etc.
(See Supreme Court Decision 95Da8713 delivered on August 23, 1996). A possessor may demand the return of an article in question when he/she was deprived of his/her possession. In such a case, the claim for the recovery of possession can only be examined as to whether the claimant had occupied the article at the time when he/she asserts that he/she was deprived of possession. The claim for the recovery of possession can only be seen as to whether the claimant had actually possessed the right of retention, etc. asserted as the ground for possession.