2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, there is no past record of punishment heavier than a fine, and the stolen mobile phone devices have returned to the victims.

However, in light of the form, method, frequency, etc. of each of the crimes of this case, the crime is bad, the defendant has been punished once as the same crime, the defendant has been repeatedly committed the same crime even after the dismissal of the request for detention warrant against the defendant, and even after the release of the request for detention warrant against the defendant, the damage caused by the fraudulent crime has not been recovered at all, the victims have not been agreed, there has been no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, and the motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.