beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.01.17 2013고단1160

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The victim F Co., Ltd. for the operation of E (hereinafter “victim”) is a company that has a place of business in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gtel 1803 and engages in the distribution business. Defendant A, as a member of the victim company from January 201, was engaged in the business of shipping the observers kept in the warehouse and delivering them to the customer. Defendant B is a person who carries out the distribution business.

1. Defendant A’s delivery summary by Defendant A without the victim’s prior confirmation process against the customer

Using the receipt that Defendant A receives from the customer to verify whether the quantity was actually supplied after the shipment, the quantity of the goods recorded in the request shall be released once, and through the receipt that Defendant A received from the customer, the shipment summary

The release volume in the audience was stated in the audience, and the victim company's presence was deducted, and the victim company's disposal was made.

Defendant

A around March 2, 2012, at the warehouse of the victim company located in Sung-nam-si, Sungnam-si, a false shipment of 68.7 km, which is less than the reference value to be actually supplied to the Dok's Twitter, the Customer, at the warehouse of the victim company located in Sung-nam-si.

After preparing a statement of request to the head of the headquarters, who is a warehouse manager, presented it to I, including that he received more than 68.7 km of the victim's own 68.7kg at the market price from I and obtained it by fraud, which is equivalent to 8,244,000 won, from around that time to October 19, 2012, by deceiving the victim company as if he would deliver it to 8 business partners, such as the listed in the attached list 1 of the crime list from around that time to around October 2012.

2. Defendant B, as described in the above 1. Paragraph 1., knowing that the custody value of the victim company acquired by deceiving and deceiving the victim company as described in the above paragraph 1. is stolen, Defendant B, who received the above custody value from A and received the sale of the stolen goods, shall be divided into one half of the proceeds, and he acquired stolen goods by receiving 68.7 km from A around March 2, 2012.