2. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case when it comes to the trial, and led to the confession and rebuttal of each of the crimes of this case, the victim does not want the punishment at the investigation stage, the purchase of a comprehensive insurance policy, and the past violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, even though each of the crimes of this case was committed without taking any measures to avoid traffic accidents causing human and material damage by shocking the vehicle of the victim due to the negligent negligence of the central line while driving, each of the crimes of this case is not good in light of the contents of the crime, and the degree of the injury inflicted on the victim is limited to the extent that it needs to be treated for 6 weeks, and considering all other circumstances that constitute the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable and it is not justified. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.