A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of twenty thousand won, each.

except that this judgment.

Defendant

A is the representative director of Suwon-si Seoul Building D, and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of performance and exhibition planning.

1. No person shall issue or receive a tax invoice under tax-related Acts without supplying or receiving goods or services;

Nevertheless, the defendant, at around November 2, 2014, issued five false tax invoices as if he/she supplied services in an amount equivalent to KRW 454,545,45, and KRW 455 to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., without having supplied goods or services to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., from around that time to December 11, 2015, and issued five false tax invoices as if he/she supplied services in an aggregate of KRW 1,724,463,018 to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and received services in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,724,463,018, including the supply price of goods or services from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., Ltd., from around November 7, 2014; and the fact was issued from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., Ltd. to the extent that he/she received services in an amount equivalent to KRW 86,810,00,000 from the Dispute Resolution Co.,2198.

2. The Defendant A, a representative of the Defendant’s business, issued a false tax invoice or issued a false tax invoice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written accusation, a written statement of suspicion of tax offense (F), a written answer (F) and a written report on completion of the investigation of value-added tax, and a supplementary statement of value-added tax investigation;

1. E and processing electronic tax invoices, electronic tax invoices (sale), five copies of electronic tax invoices (sale), and 11 copies of electronic tax invoices (purchase).