No defendant has inflicted any bodily injury.

2. According to the evidence of the judgment below, the court below acknowledged the fact that the defendant, when carrying the elevator in the elevator, returned the direction of the electric wheelchairs back to the victim's bath while driving with the victim in the elevator while taking the wheel, caused the victim's bodily injury. The defendant at least caused the victim's bodily injury by approaching the electric wheelchairs while taking the wheel, and there was an intention in the internal deliberation to recognize the possibility that the victim was suffering from the electric wheelchairs, i.e., the intention in the internal deliberation to allow the victim's bodily injury by approaching the electric wheelchairs while taking the victim's bath.

For the reason that it is recognized, the defendant was pronounced guilty.

Dag on the circumstances as stated in the judgment below which are duly examined and adopted by the court below, E is a witness to take an oath at the court below to make a concrete statement on the damage situations at the time when the injured party took an oath, and its credibility is recognized in accordance with the above statement and injury parts, and at the time the injured party “hick fishing.”

“........ the Defendant “........”

In addition to the above facts, we affirm the judgment of the court below as just, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts or by misunderstanding the legal principles as alleged by the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.