A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant IndexM Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant IndexM”).

(1) Defendant Dong-dong Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dong-dong Energy”).

(2) On May 2, 2016, the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the designated parties subcontracted the installation work of solar energy facilities to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and worked at the installation work site of the above solar facilities by the day on which June 30, 2016 were employed by Defendant East Energy.

3) Until now, Defendant Dong-dong Energy does not pay to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 9,50,000, KRW 9,300,000, KRW 7,500,000 to the Selection Party B, KRW 9,300,00 to the Selection Party C, and KRW 9,30,000 to the Selection Party D. / [Grounds for recognition] evidence Nos. 1, 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

B. According to the above findings of determination, Defendant Dong-dong Energy is obligated to pay the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) 9,50,000 won as unpaid wages, 9,300,000 won to the Selection B, 7,500,000 won to the Selection C, 9,300,000 won to the Selection D, the date following the date of the last work provided, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum under the Commercial Act from July 1, 2016 to September 1, 2017, which is the date of delivery of a duplicate of the complaint of this case, and from the following day to the date of full payment, 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant indexM

A. As the Plaintiff (Appointed)’s assertion that the Defendant index CM was liable for the wages of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties as a construction contractor in the direct position of Defendant East Energy, the Defendant index CM is jointly and severally liable with Defendant East Energy to pay the unpaid wages to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties.

B. There is no evidence to acknowledge that the judgment was made by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendant index CM were responsible for the wages of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, and thus, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) is appointed.