2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to C buses (hereinafter “instant buses”), and the Plaintiff was on board D passenger cars at the time of October 19, 2017 (hereinafter “AV”).

B. On October 19, 2017, around 04:00, the Plaintiff changed the lanes into two lanes in front of the Vice-General of the G Tax Affairs in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.

However, E, a driver of a vehicle driving at the time, did not recognize the existence of the bus in this case parked on the two-lanes of the above road. As a result, E, a driver of the vehicle driving at the time, had the front side of the vehicle (the front side of the vehicle on the right side) and the left side of the bus in this case.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) C.

As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the fulverization flaver, fladrat fladrat, fladrat fladrat, and fladrat fladrat on the part of the

[Ground of Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, evidence 5, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including evidence with each number), the purpose of the whole pleadings and arguments]

2. Occurrence of liability for damages and limitation on liability;

A. According to the above facts, the main cause of the instant accident is the negligence of the operator of a sea-going vehicle. However, the existence of the instant bus parked at the edge of the road is also the cause of the instant accident. Thus, the Defendant, who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant bus, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff, who is the victim of the instant accident, for damages caused by the instant accident.

B. However, the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as seen earlier, and ① the driver or insurer of a sea-going vehicle in this case does not claim for damages.