2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant recognized all of the facts charged of this case, and is in violation of depth, but the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of even though he was in the period of repeated crime due to his previous offense, and each of the crimes of this case includes the defendant, and provided a new criminal act by opening and transferring a so-called "Soverbook" in an organized and organic manner by sharing his role, and took profits therefrom. Accordingly, the crime of this case is not good because of its high social closure group, such as undermining the sound economic order and good morals of society, and thus, the crime of this case is considerably poor. The period and frequency of each of the crimes of this case are considerably high, such as 150 times over two months, and the defendant can be punished more than a suspended sentence due to this crime, and the defendant can be punished more than a suspended sentence due to this crime, and the sentencing of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the court below's "application of Acts and subordinate statutes" 1. Formal concurrence: It is obvious that the omission was made between the crimes of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act committed at the same place on the same date as Article 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and therefore, it is corrected ex officio by correcting that the addition was made pursuant

.