If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cruise car.

On April 2, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on April 2, 2017:35, and came to turn to the left from the intersection of Seodaemun-gu in the direction of the new intersection, along the two-lanes of D in front of Busan Metropolitan Government C. D.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to turn to the left, and neglected to turn to the left, received the part of the E-driving F. F.M. rocketing taxi front of the said car, which was going to the left from the right side of the Defendant’s running, to the left side, and went to the front, and received the victim G(49 years old) and the victim H(45 years old) in front of the said car from the Defendant’s driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G by occupational negligence, i.e., the part in which the detailed details of the chain frame that requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment, and the victim H suffered injury, i.e., the victim’s side typ fever and the part ion of the chain that require approximately 7 weeks of treatment, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and each statement of traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses, registration bureau, and automobile insurance subscription certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each accident site photograph and black stuff photographic image;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the defendant.