On February 3, 2016, the Defendant, at around 05:01, boarded Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, was on board a victim C ( South, 39 years old) who had the intent and ability to pay taxi fares at the entrance of the alley-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

However, the defendant did not have cash on the wall at the time and did not have a card so that he did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi even if he did so.

Even so, Defendant 1 did not pay KRW 14,100,00 after moving approximately 12 km to the monthly 81-9, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, the purpose of which is the taxi of the above victim.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Sentence of a fine not exceeding 300,000 won;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the period of custody in prison) of the Criminal Act (the period of 100,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence: The fact that the defendant has no record of crime subject to suspension of qualification or more severe punishment, one hundred and fifty thousand won has been deposited against the victim, the reason why the taxi fee of this case has not been paid, the reason why the defendant was not paid the taxi fee of this case, his mistake against himself, and other circumstances revealed at the trial of this case shall be taken