However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 11, 2017, at around 01:30, the Defendant, at the main point of Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City “C” located in Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, talked with the victim D (37 taxes) who fright to drink and talk, and, at the same time, the Defendant frighted the victim’s fright to read “I fright, fright, and fright to be punished.” On his own hand, the Defendant frighted the victim’s fright to fright, and fright the victim’s fright to fright to fright, and fright to fright the victim’s left fright to fright to fright the victim’s b

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of examination certificates of suspect interrogation protocol with regard to D, or photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense. Article 257 (1) of the said Act (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of the recommended punishment] General Injury (general injury) in the basic area (from April to one year and six months) (no person in special sentencing)

2. Determination of sentence: (a) comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the instant crime, and the details of the instant crime; and (b) the sentence as ordered.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The degree of injury, such as the depth tearing of the eyebrow of the victim, shall not be less severe; circumstances favorable to the victim that do not have been agreed with: there is no same kind of crime;