도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that, around April 8, 1998, at around 22:49, an employee A of the Defendant violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating B vehicle with the cargo loaded with a gross weight exceeding 7.3 tons exceeding 7.3 tons and a gross weight exceeding 1.1 ton exceeding 1.1 ton of a gross weight exceeding 47.3 tons, and a gross weight of 4 ton of a 4 ton exceeding 1.1 ton of a limited weight, and a gross weight of 5 ton exceeding 11 ton.
However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions to the facts charged in this case, provides that "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation." The Constitutional Court decision 2010Hun-Ga38 of Oct. 28, 2010 and the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions to the facts charged in this case, has retroactively lost its effect.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.