If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. On July 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the “E convenience store” of the victim D’s operation in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu (Seoul-gu) around 10:14, the Defendant: (b) committed theft by putting the victim’s 1 sick share in the market price, which is the victim’s possession at that place, into the Defendant’s knicker’s mos.

2. On July 4, 2017, at the same convenience store, the Defendant: (a) took a theft from first to second by the same method, which was the victim’s market value displayed at that place; (b) around 08:5 on July 10, 2017, the Defendant: (c) took a theft from first to fourth in the same convenience store; (d) around 15:07 on July 10, 201, at the same convenience store, the victim’s market value displayed at that place; and (e) around 7:0 on the same way, the Defendant took a theft from the same convenience store; (e) around 1:7:0 on the same day, the victim’s market price displayed at that place; and (e) around 1:7:0 on the same day, the Defendant took a theft from the same convenience store; (e) around 10:22; and (e) around 1:7:7:0 on the same day, on the same convenience store owned by the victim; and (e.g.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of CCTV photographs, on-site and CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is the same again even though the defendant had the record of punishment for the same crime two times.