보상금증액 청구의 소
1. The Defendant: 14,688,500 won to Plaintiff A; 100,490,180 won to Plaintiff B; 10,283,610 won to Plaintiff C; and 97.
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: E-Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): The public notice of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 26, 2013 - The defendant:
B. The Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation - The land to be expropriated and the goods to be expropriated (hereinafter “land and goods to be expropriated in this case”) and the compensation for the loss: The following [Attachment 1] is indicated.
- An appraisal corporation - 1. 2015. 9. 11. - An appraisal corporation: Korea Standards, 200 square meters for 40, 275 square meters for 40, 275 square meters for 208 square meters for 132 square meters for the land and goods to be expropriated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “adjudication”) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “G Dong”), 401,280, 400 square meters for 93 square meters for 4,785,000 square meters for 47, 275,260, 260 square meters for 40, 278, 260 square meters for 40, 278, 280, 308, 280, 304 square meters for the above land and goods to be expropriated, 208, 308,784,204 square meters for 40,804 square meters for the above land and goods.
C. A certified public appraiser’s appraisal corporation (hereinafter “court appraiser”), which belongs to Sail Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Sail Appraisal Corporation”) entrusted by this Court, shall be selected respectively as P land (H and I land), Qua land (hereinafter “K land”), R land (L land), and S land (M and N land) in neighboring areas in which specific-use area (Class II general-use area) is identical and similar in terms of comparative and standard land for the land to be expropriated in this case, and having similar usefulness.