농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of two thousand won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates a livestock product processing business with the trade name "C" from the first floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
From November 2, 2019 to January 15, 2020, the Defendant purchased for KRW 35,767,830 from the said place of business, “E” located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, for which KRW 6,68.1kg of Denmarkic acid, Canada's imported swine, and for which KRW 6,38.1kg of 35,767,830 was mixed with the above imported swine spawn and domestic swine spawn from November 4, 2019 to February 7, 2020, and sold them to the business partners with the said imported swine spawn and Korean swine spawn and entered the origin of the swine spawn, an agricultural product on the trade list of swine spawn in Korea, as “domestic spawn.”
Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of labeling that could cause confusion about the country of origin.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A written statement;
1. Each report on internal investigation (the investigation of the origin mark of the supplier of the king-Slag, arrangement of the reporter's currency content, details of telephone notice as a result of the examination of anti-aircraft samples taken out, investigation report (the correction of part of the origin of the imported swine Bags in accordance with the contents of the second examination) and investigation report);
1. The application of evidence photographs, field photographs, the details of the purchase of C and E imported cash, the details of C importation and the sales of domestic currency c, the details of sales by C and C, the details of sales by C and C, the copy of C and the business registration certificate, and the Acts and subordinate statutes on business reports;
1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Articles 14 (1) and 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Imposition of Imprisonment with labor and fines concurrently;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);
1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: The Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime are committed, together with the following circumstances.