[criminal power] On September 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor at the Seoul Northern District Court for the crime of interference with business, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 23, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On March 15, 2014, at around 19:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance between several parts of the space, on the ground that the victim demanded alcohol, tobacco value, etc. in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that the victim did not bring the alcohol, tobacco value, etc. into the restaurant.

From that time to April 12, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the restaurant business of the victims by force by avoiding the disturbance in the restaurant operated by three victims over 10 times as shown in the attached list of crimes.

2. Destruction of and damage to property, and attempted attempts to commit suicide;

A. On March 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, at a “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul; (b) among the Doescing the disturbance as set out in paragraph (1) 2, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim did not bring the entrance of the restaurant into the restaurant, and caused the 20,000 won of the repair cost to be carried out by the lock-gu equipment owned by the victim.

B. On March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00, at the “H” restaurant operated by the Victim G in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) during the course of avoiding disturbance as set forth in paragraph (1) 8, the Defendant destroyed the vehicle by walking at the customer’s market value equivalent to 30,000 won; and (c) 50,000 won of the victim.

“The victim has withdrawn money from the victim, but the victim failed to do so with the wind that the victim refuses to do so and failed to do so.

C. The Defendant, at around 21:10 on April 12, 2014, on the same place as paragraph (a), on the ground that the victim D does not bring the disturbance into the restaurant entrance by locking it and bringing it into the restaurant, as set out in paragraph (1) 10.