A. Each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land” according to the sequence, and, in case of a common name, “each of the instant lands” is currently unregistered land and thus, land No. 1 through No. 4 of this case on the old land cadastre and land cadastre is currently unregistered on August 15, 1913, and land No. 5 of this case was under the circumstances of NN on March 2, 1914, and no other information that can identify the name of address, resident registration number, etc. is written.

B. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, K, M, M, P, Q, Q, S, TR, T, U,V, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AD, AD, AE, AE, AF, AF, AH, AH, AI, AJ, AK, and AM (hereinafter “Defendant’s heir”) transferred the property of the AO (AO, AP, AP, death on December 26, 1950, death on December 26, 1950, and at the place of origin: Q Q). The Defendant’s heir’s heir’s share in inheritance is identical to each corresponding share in attached Table 2.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-5, Gap evidence 2-1 through 6, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4-1 through 14, Gap evidence 5-1 and 5-2, each fact fact fact fact fact finding, Gap evidence 1-5, Eul evidence 5-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a whole.

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. As to the Defendant’s inheritors, “AO”, the joint line between the Defendant’s inheritors (hereinafter “AO”) and “N”, the land cadastre of each of the instant lands, which is the name of the land cadastre of the Defendant’s inheritors.

There are different names, but the same person is the same.

On January 1, 1965, 1965, the Plaintiff was selected as the ex post facto breeder of the net AR and donated each of the instant land to the Plaintiff on the death of AO, and the Defendant’s heir was succeeded to each of the instant land as indicated in the attached Table 2, upon the death of ASS.

Therefore, the Defendant’s heir raises objection to the Plaintiff.