However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the driver of a concrete mixed truck.

At around 10:20 on May 17, 2016, the Defendant proceeded at the speed of 45 km each hour in the direction of keeping the distance from a dry direction to a long distance of 785 km in the face of the Pari-si aptitude.

Since there is a shooting range in which signal lights are installed, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left, but it was driven by the victim C (23 years old) who turn to the left from the opposite direction to the left pursuant to the new subparagraph at the time of the left by negligence in violation of this, and received the front part of the military vehicle's front part of the truck.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim C, such as brain-dead, etc., which had no two or more organs in need of medical treatment for about four weeks, and injury to the victim D (year 41) who was accompanied by the damaged military vehicle, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as brain-dead, etc., in which there is no two or more organs in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements related to the preparation of D;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (10) of the Management of Traffic Accidents Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 268

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend a large truck is that the defendant committed the crime of this case by negligence in violation of the signal while driving the large truck, and that the victim two persons inflicted considerable bodily harm is disadvantageous to the defendant, or that the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance and agreed with the victims, that the defendant has no criminal record except a fine imposed once in January 1993, and that the defendant reflects it.