beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.12.22 2015노2699

사기등

Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

Defendant .

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) that Defendant A sentenced to imprisonment (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and confiscation) by the lower court against Defendant A is too unreasonable.

Defendant

B The sentence of imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and confiscation) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendants is too unhued and unfair.

Defendant

The defendant's judgment against A seems to have led to the crime of this case, and the fact that the agreement was submitted under the agreement with the victimN is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case took part in the so-called singinging, etc., which causes damage to many unspecified victims in a systematic manner, and thus requires a strict punishment due to severe social criticism. Furthermore, the defendant did not have the record of juvenile protective disposition issued by the Incheon District Court on December 15, 2014 due to the same crime but again committed the crime of this case. In full view of various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstance before and after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant is too heavy or too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

Defendant

The crime of this case against B was committed in a systematic manner by which the defendant was involved in the so-called scaming, etc., which causes damage to many unspecified victims, and thus requires strict punishment due to the high possibility of social criticism.

However, it appears that the defendant is against the truth that he committed the crime of this case, and that he is divided, and there is no criminal power.

참조조문