When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall allow any person to reach another person repeatedly in the form of code, words, sound, image, or picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network.

1. 그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2015. 7. 2. 22:55경 인천 남동구 B아파트 605동 2104호에서 자신의 휴대전화를 이용하여 피해자 C의 휴대전화번호인 D로 '자식농사 잘못 지셨네요. C님 남은 인생이라도 제대로 사세요. 이 사기전과놈 부친님. ㅍㅎㅎ'이라는 문자메시지를 도달하게 하는 등 별지 범죄일람표(Ⅰ) 기재와 같이 총 7회에 걸쳐 피해자 C에게 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하는 문언을 반복적으로 도달하게 하였다.

2. On July 3, 2015, at around 12:21, the Defendant: (a) using his mobile phone in front of the Korean-style apartment complex 5-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, the five mobile phone number of the victim E, i.e., F., the mobile phone number of the victim E, and (b) can see whether the Plaintiff is aware of the width and G’s influorial relationship; and (c) if the G husband becomes aware of the width and G’s influorial relationship, it must be known that he was aware of the width and G. In the cleaning industry, HOE, he was aware that he was aware of the width and G influorial relationship, and even HOE reached the text that arouses the victim’s fear or apprehensions repeatedly over 21 times in total, such as the list of crimes (Ⅱ).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as text messages and photographs;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and the Selection of each fine concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;