도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On October 2, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court, and a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine at the Seoul Western District Court on December 29, 201.
On March 24, 2020, at around 22:30, the Defendant driven C rocketing car with approximately 10 meters alcohol concentration 0.159% under the influence of alcohol in the Songpa-gu Seoul Public Parking Lot.
Accordingly, the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the statement of the situation of a drinking driver, investigation report (report on the circumstances of a drinking driver), details of crackdown, and inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;
1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (a copy of summary order);
1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: A drunk driving is likely to cause a traffic accident by raising the possibility of occurrence of a traffic accident and thus resulting in a dangerous criminal that may cause unexpected conduct to the life and home of others as well as others; a defendant has a record of being punished twice by a fine due to drunk driving: The defendant has no record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence or more; the above circumstances and the conditions of sentencing specified in the trial process of the instant case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively determined as the sentence as ordered