A Imprisonment of two years, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year and four months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of ten months, and Defendant D’s fine of two years.

[2014 Highest 2186 [Suspension of indictment on the same day] Non-prosecution L (the same day) led the victims to commit so-called fraud by forcing many and unspecified domestic unspecified persons in China to transfer money to another person’s public institution’s employees, such as prosecution, or financial institutions by deceiving the victims into the one under the name of another (China’s general responsibility); the one which collects and delivers the one which is to use for the crime; the one which collects and delivers the cash card; the one who withdraws the money from the one which is deposited in the one hand account; the one who withdraws the money taken out; the one who delivers the money taken out to the one by receiving the money taken out; the other who remits the money from the one hand account; the one who transfers the money to China; and the one who solicits the accomplice to pay the money in return for the promise to commit the crime.

Defendant

C, other than public prosecution, M and N(transfer on the same day) play the role of cash withdrawals by withdrawing cash from the specified accounts after receiving the passbook in the name of another person and the cash card from the collection book of the passbook in accordance with the direction of the total liability L.

Defendant

A plays the role of cash collection to collect cash from Defendant C, etc. according to the direction of the total liability, which is the withdrawal book, and deliver it to the remittance book.

Defendant

B was responsible for the role of the head of the Tong recruitment system that takes over the cash card, the means of access to electronic financial transactions, and delivers it to cash withdrawal books.

1. On August 18, 2014, the Defendants’ fraud using computers, etc., made a phone call to the victim victimO on or around 14:00, and made a false call to the effect that “The Defendants are the P investigator in charge of financial fraud in the Seoul Regional Police Agency, and are used as a passbook because the victim’s account was stolen, and thus, should protect the deposit.”