beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.08.09 2019고단902

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

The evidence seized shall be forfeited from the criminal defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 23, 2012, Defendant B was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on October, 2012, and was sentenced to eight months of suspension of execution at the Busan District Court on January 8, 2014 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 16, 2014, and completed the execution of the said sentence on July 24, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. From November 2, 2017, Defendant A and Defendant C had four operators of a sexual traffic establishment, such as “E, F, G, and H,” in the place of the sexual traffic establishment located in Si/Gun/Gu from around November 2, 2017, employ a female, and had Defendant A engage in sexual traffic at an establishment operated by Defendant A or another establishment located in the place of the sexual traffic, and, if Defendant C engaged in sexual traffic at his/her own establishment, Defendant A acquired KRW 40,000,000, out of KRW 60,000 per time of sexual traffic and had another establishment engage in sexual traffic take place, Defendant A and other companies acquire KRW 20,00,000,000 per time of sexual traffic, and around April 2018, Defendant C and Defendant C conspired with the above “E” and sent Defendant C a sexual traffic establishment to Defendant C to receive the said female female sexual traffic, and requested Defendant C to receive the said female sexual traffic from Defendant C.

Defendant

A around November 2, 2017, upon introducing A for a female sexual traffic from B, paid approximately KRW 18 million in advance to B, and later, employed the said I under the condition that the said I repays KRW 23 million in advance, and, under the said condition, up to January 1, 2018, up to the average number of times of approximately 15 times per day until January 1, 2018, Defendant A’s business places or other business places located in the assembly area for about 4.61 sexual intercourses with Defendant A on a total of 4.61 sexual intercourses, and around April 2018, Defendant J for sexual traffic.