When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 30, 2014, the Defendant retired from office at the image flusing point B of the company around November 30, 2014, and was serving in C after re-employment from January 12, 2015, and thus, the Defendant did not meet the requirements for receiving job-seeking benefits.

The Defendant submitted an application for verification of unemployment prepared by a public official in charge of unemployment benefits who fails to meet the requirements for receiving job-seeking benefits at the government branch office of the central government branch office of the central government branch office of the central government branch office of the central government branch office of the central government branch office of the central government office of the central government of the regional government of the regional government of the regional government of the regional government of the regional government of the regional government of the local government of January 21, 2015, for job-seeking benefits, from December 25, 2014 to April 8, 2015, the Defendant received the total of KRW 1,050,30, and KRW 787,750, around February 12, 2015; KRW 1,050, KRW 30, KRW 30, around March 12, 2015; and KRW 303,308,379,398, respectively.

As a result, the defendant received job-seeking benefits by fraud or other improper means, and at the same time acquired job-seeking benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement protocol with D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (data concerning fraudulent receipt of unemployment benefits);

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the fraudulent point) and Article 116(1) of the Insurance Act (the illegal receipt of job-seeking benefits);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant returns all illegal job-seeking benefits, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various conditions of sentencing such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for the crime, method and consequence of the crime.