1. According to the records as to the grounds for appeal by Defendant A, B, C, D, and E, the above Defendants appealed from the judgment of the first instance, and asserted the mistake of facts with the sentencing on the grounds of the appeal, but withdrawn the grounds for appeal as to mistake of facts on the first trial date of the lower court.

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by mistake of facts and violation of the rules of evidence cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. On the grounds of the prosecutor’s appeal, the court below reversed the judgment of the court of first instance which convicted Defendant A and B on the grounds that there was no proof of crime regarding the fact of violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name as to the trust in the name of each real estate owner as stated in the attached Table No. 4 of the crime committed in the judgment of the court below among the charges of this case against Defendant A and B and the facts charged against

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.