국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.
2. In light of favorable circumstances such as the confession of a crime, the confession of a crime, the fact that there is no record of exceeding the fines, the fact that the original state has restored, the wide area of the forest damaged by the defendant without permission, and the restoration from the original state by the defendant;
Even if the damaged forest was completely restored to its original state
In full view of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, frequency of crimes, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is difficult to view it is too unreasonable in light of the overall sentencing conditions.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.