2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case for the first time in the judgment of the court, against whom the Defendant reflects, and that the Defendant had parents to support the Defendant.

However, considering the fact that narcotics-related crimes are highly harmful to society due to toxicity, the Defendant has already been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, and the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, the Defendant’s purchase and possession of phiphonephones, and the fact that the Defendant made a false statement that he/she was issued with phiphones from F in the course of investigation and trial, etc., and that F is subject to investigation, it is disadvantageous to the Defendant. In full view of the circumstances, such as the criminal punishment and equity for other crimes similar to each of the instant crimes, as well as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, occupation and environment, family relationship, as well as the circumstances after the commission of each of the instant crimes, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.