However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 14:50 on October 3, 2016, the Defendant assaulted “D cafeteria” located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, by assaulting the victim, on the part of the victim E (39 years of age) and the part of the victim’s left part of the body of the body of the victim one time and four times at both hand, and carried out an autopsy with the victim for about 14 days in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (as to attachment of a victim’s statement protocol) and a criminal investigation report (as to attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 21, 2011; Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1488, Feb. 21, 201; Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1488, Feb. 21, 201)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (resumed grounds for reduction of the amount of punishment);