A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (under four months) by the court below is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have caused serious injury to the victim by shocking the victim, who is a child, by negligence committed while driving a cargo in the one-way zone, and the nature and circumstances of the crime are not provided against the victim. Since the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim, the victim's side wanted to punish the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case, which seriously reflects the defendant's mistake, and deposit 8,000,000 won in total for the victim up to the trial, and other various circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's sentence against the defendant is too minor or unreasonable. Thus, both the prosecutor and the defendant's assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.