When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, from around 23:00 on December 17, 2015 to 23:30 on the same day, tried to enter from the state of exploitation in the victim D and Fria in which the victim E work in Pyeongtaek-si and the victim E., and was prevented from the victims, and as the victims were prevented from the victims, the Defendant, “Samina, Ne,” to the victims of Cria, Neas.

They considered that they were drinking in doing so.

whether or not to enter;

In accordance with the principle, the victims were unable to enter and leave the crypt by avoiding disturbance, such as “the same year,” and thus making it impossible for them to properly perform their business operations.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victims' privacy and business affairs by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment to field images);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;