Of the facts charged in the instant case, the attached list 2) Of the affairs related to port-related affairs is voluntarily set out.

1. On August 15, 2006, the Defendant in occupational breach of trust organized and operated a unit of 21 units of the Gu with the victim B, etc. as a fraternity around August 15, 2006, 200 million won, and one million won of the fraternity payments.

On January 15, 2008, when the defendant received a total amount of KRW 20 million from the fraternity members in the residence of the defendant defendant C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the defendant had a duty to pay KRW 20 million to the victim B of the person who received the fraternity money in the month, although there was a duty to pay KRW 20 million, the defendant did not pay the fraternity money in violation of that duty.

In addition, from around that time to April 15, 2008, the Defendant did not pay a total of KRW 45 million to four victims, such as the list of crimes in attached Table 1) between the Defendant and that time, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the above fraternity and causing property damage equivalent to the same amount to the victims.

2. On January 208, 2008, the Defendant was unable to pay the money to the victims E in relation to the number meters operated by the Defendant in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Suwon-si, and the fourth floor. “In relation to the number meters operated by the Defendant, the Defendant was unable to pay the money to the members who should keep the money out of the money in this month, and thus, the Defendant did not pay the money.

The loan shall be paid in full to the fraternity members who have borrowed money, and the loan shall be paid in full to the F who has received the immediately monthly payment, and the F shall be paid in full.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any special property or income, and he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the damaged party because he borrowed the money from the fraternity to repay the defendant's personal debt.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 6.5 million won from the injured party during the middle of January 2008 and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;