However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 30, 2014, at the front of the Seoul Western Police Station D District, Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, on October 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the Defendant, who was at the police station E affiliated with the said district police group, for whom he did not pay a fare to a taxi engineer, such as questioning the Defendant who was at a destination, and getting off from the taxi at his own taxi, “I sing off, I sing off, I sing off,” and pushed off the e-throf, and pushed it by hand, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of CCTV photographs and video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances, etc. considered as the reasons for sentencing):

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of recommendation] (the decision of sentence] the sentencing guidelines for the defendant's crime of this case are as above.

In light of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine due to violence and that it was not good to commit the instant crime that obstructs the performance of official duties by means of breaking breaths by a police officer who wears a uniform on one occasion under the influence of alcohol and without justifiable cause, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor. However, the Defendant’s mistake is against himself and the Defendant did not have the same criminal record, and the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, etc. were taken into account, and the execution of imprisonment with prison labor is suspended only once, and the sentence is determined as ordered.