양수금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 88,300,000 and the amount of KRW 38,000 among them shall be from January 18, 2014 to the date of full payment.
1. Basic facts
A. To conclude a prior lease contract and succeed 1) B D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D.
(C) A social welfare foundation C (hereinafter “C”) on November 1, 2006
) Two floors (hereinafter “instant building”) among the four-story neighborhood living facilities and education and research facilities on the ground of the first floor underground reinforced concrete structure of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground reinforced concrete structure.
) The lease amount of KRW 100,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 11,000,000, and the lease period of KRW 11,00,000 from November 1, 2006 to October 31, 201 (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”) was leased under the said lease agreement between B school association and C.
(2) Around June 2008, C paid KRW 100,000 as security deposit to B B, and B had delivered the instant building to C. 2) Multilateral Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “multilateral Construction”) succeeded to the lessor’s status under the prior lease contract of this case from C with the consent of C around June 2008.
C did not pay 8,00,000 won in total for multi-party comprehensive construction until October 31, 201, when the term of the prior lease agreement of this case expired.
B. On January 20, 2012, after the expiration of the term of the instant lease agreement, multi-unit construction, which entered into a lease agreement of the future, was leased to the Defendant with the amount of KRW 50,000,000 per deposit for the instant building, KRW 17,00,000 per month for the rent management expenses (value added tax is separate) and the lease period from January 20, 2012 for one year from January 20, 2012
(hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”). Around that time, pursuant to the said lease agreement, the Defendant paid KRW 50,000,000 to multi-party comprehensive construction as security deposit, and multi-party comprehensive construction delivered the instant building to the Defendant.
Meanwhile, according to the future lease agreement of this case, the Defendant was to pay the water and electricity fees used in the building of this case separately from the rent management fees.
(c).