beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.09.29 2014고단2296

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On September 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Incheon District Court’s Vice Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Incheon Detention Center on February 5, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】 A person who has operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment called “D” on the third floor of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, and E is a person who has worked as the head of the office at the above business establishment.

The Defendant, in collusion with E on December 18, 2013, in operating the said commercial sex acts, had eight rooms, one waiting room for female employees, one warehouse, and employment of female employees, such as F and G, and had female employees receive 70,000 won in cash in return for commercial sex acts from H, a male customer, who has found the said business place, and had female employees F (F, 36 years of age) take h's sexual organ from five business places to h's sexual organ in person, and had them do similar acts. From the following day to March 18, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. by having female employees independently find out the same place, and by having them do such similar acts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning E, F, and G;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records and other inquiry reports and individual identification and confinement status Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders has favorable conditions, such as recognizing and opposing the defendant's mistake, considering the fact that the defendant continued to engage in business even after the business operation method, size, business period, and control of the sexual traffic business establishment of this case, the crime is a crime committed during the period of repeated crimes, and all the conditions for sentencing, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, shall be determined as per the disposition.