beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.19 2015고단1775

변호사법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

50,100,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was working in the E market from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2010, was able to exercise influence over the personnel affairs of the E-si public officials or various orders for construction works, with the intention to receive money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by the E-si public officials.

1. On July 2008, the Defendant: (a) at the “H” singing shop located in G and 601, the Defendant: (b) “I kept silents in which the distribution period has expired; and (c) would be subject to a disposition of suspension of business for 15 days; (b) I would be able to look at how to close the place of business; (c) upon the request of “Igman?”; and (d) upon receipt of the request of “Igman?s Domino???????? I see my person in charge?????”

On July 31, 2008, the Defendant: “I talk to the person in charge of internal affairs,” and “I was issued one million won from I to the person in charge of internal affairs, i.e., “I have given up or promoted to the person in charge,” and “I have given up or promoted to the person in charge of internal affairs,” and “I have taken off the person in charge of internal affairs or the mother’s public health clinic to impose penalty surcharges.” The Defendant will enter the public health clinic in charge of internal affairs or the mother’s public health clinic, and will have the person in charge of internal affairs, and will have the person in charge of internal affairs, who will be considered to be the person in charge of internal affairs, and will not be able to do so, even if I was able to do so.”

As a result, the defendant was given one million won under the pretext of solicitation or good offices with respect to cases or affairs handled by public officials.

2. Around January 2009, the Defendant: (a) stated that L, an operator of (ju) K, who is a waterproof and painting company, would be able to give a license for construction of a road package for the prevention of fordrums (hereinafter “slocks”) supervised by EM.

L is owned by the operators of (i)M and (ii)N with the patent technology for the three-dimensional construction works, or (ii) the operator of the three-dimensional construction works.