정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The victim C and D had a couple's history, and the victim's sexual intercourse with the male-friendly body that had been married three years prior to his marriage, etc. were spreaded on the cyber street in 2015 by the male-friendly body, etc., and the male of the video was called "E video" on the ground that the male of the video was similar to the celebbrity of the celebrity of the celebrity and the appearance of the celebrity of the celebrity and the celebrity of the celebrity of the celebrity and the celebrity of the celebrity
The Defendant is a member of the Internet portal site “W.daum.ne.” (www: f. A. G).
On October 18, 2015, the Defendant, within his own vehicle where it is impossible to know the area around 21:36, posted the comments on the comments, “In case of “In case of”, the Defendant visited the article of JTBC, which is an article related to the victim, etc. posted on the relevant site, [St] H, “I”, and posted the comments on “In case of “In this case, I shall be sound and good,” in the column of comments on the comments.
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by exposing public facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. A statement to the effect that the defendant has written comments, such as the entries in the ruling, in this court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Copies of police statements made to C or D;
1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen of a speech closure;
1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the relevant Act;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. In light of the contents of the article alleged by the defendant and his defense counsel, it cannot be deemed that the victim’s reputation is specified, or the content of the statement written by the defendant is prejudicial to the victim’s reputation.
B. A defendant who is a defendant.