However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant around October 15, 2017, around 04:16, on the front way of “D” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Geumcheon-gu, and is running closed business.

“A” to F himself, who was asked F of the damages from the past F of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station E District Department, called upon 112 report, is about how much the amount of money would be collected from the F;

The Republic of Korea left the Republic of Korea for a long period of her life;

They are dead and dead.

“In doing so, assaulted F at one time on the part between the strong will and the finger hand.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Although the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence had been punished as his previous forces, the crime of this case is not good in that he committed the crime of this case.

However, the sentence was determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the confession and reflection of the crime, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, circumstances after the crime, family relationship, etc., and various sentencing conditions shown in the changed theory.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.