beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.05.22 2014나22583

건물명도

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except that the statement of evidence No. 8 is insufficient to recognize that Defendant B actually resided in the apartment of this case with the deceased at the time of the death of the deceased, and the statement of evidence No. 8, No. 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, and 20 (including the serial number in the case of the temporary number) is sufficient to recognize that Defendant B and Defendant C actually resided in the apartment of this case, unlike the contents of the public move-in report of the deceased at the time of the death of the deceased, as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that it is not sufficient to recognize that Defendant B and Defendant C actually resided in the apartment of this case with the deceased, as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants shall be accepted on the grounds of all of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be consistent with this conclusion, and all appeals against the defendants shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.