If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

No one shall repeatedly send any codes, text, sound, image, or motion picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network to any other person.

Nevertheless, at around 17:45 on July 25, 201, the Defendant sent a text message stating that “if a victim C (the victim, who is 33 years of age) was fright with D living together, the Defendant sent the victim’s mobile phone using the Defendant’s mobile phone (E) to the victim’s mobile phone on the ground that the victim C (E) was frighted with D, the south of the Defendant’s living together, and that “if the Defendant was unable to live or was fright at the factory accounting system from the point of age to the end of the year, the Defendant sent such text message to the Defendant, and then frightly thought that the Defendant would be bad,” from that time to December 43 of the same month, the Defendant sent the message, etc., such as the attached list of crimes, on 19 occasions, and reached the victim repeatedly causing fear or apprehension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by verifying text messages, a statement of verifying a text message number, and by cutting down text messages on the storage screen;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;