beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.08 2017고단6813

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 31, 2013, the defrauded: (a) around the first floor coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) around December 31, 2013, D, the representative director of the Victim C Co. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) of the Victim C Co., Ltd., “65 million won of completion of construction,” the Defendant would maintain capital of KRW 1.3 billion until December 31, 2013, deposit the amount into the account in the name of the Victim Co., Ltd. and issue a certificate of deposit balance for 61 days thereafter.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to issue a certificate of deposit balance by depositing capital of 1.3 billion won into the account under the name of the victim company.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the above D, obtained 4 million won in cash and 1 million won in the face value of the issuance of the E Bank Samsung Central Branch from the Defendant, and acquired 61,000,000 won in front of the check and 65,000 won in total.

2. Forging a private document;

A. On March 3, 2014, without authority, the Defendant stated that the balance of the bank account of the victim company is KRW 1.3 billion, the purport that the balance of the bank account of the victim company is KRW 1.3 billion, the fact that there is no pledge, suspension of payment, seizure and provisional seizure as of the date of issuance, and the fact that there is no record of provisional seizure as of December 31, 2013, respectively, in the same “certificate of balance of deposit” form as of February 28, 2014, respectively. The Defendant stated the purport that the balance of the bank account of the victim company is zero won, and stated in the same “certificate of balance of deposit” form as of February 28, 2014, and stated in the same “certificate of balance of deposit” form as of March 3, 2014, and stated that there is no fact of seizure, provisional seizure, provisional seizure, and official seal of each of the above “FGGG G branch office G” as the issuer column, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant is the F Bank Gangnam point, which is a private document on rights and obligations.